Geometry without data is not the point
Teams get into trouble when a model looks finished and the parameters are empty or wrong. A door family that is the right width on screen and the wrong size in the schedule will fail a submittal. BIM standards exist so authors fill the fields downstream users will trust: type marks, system names, classification. If nobody named those fields in the BIM execution plan, nobody should be surprised when they are blank.
Authoring tools differ. The coordination problem is the same. An architect’s model, a structural model, and an MEP model meet in a federated view. Clashes found there are only meaningful at the LOD the team agreed. A generic duct at LOD 200 colliding with steel is a warning. It is not a fabrication issue yet.



