AEC definitions

What Is a GMP in Construction?

Last reviewed: September 2026

A guaranteed maximum price, or GMP, is a cap on the amount the owner will pay a contractor under a cost-plus contract. The owner pays actual allowable cost plus a fee, up to that cap. Costs above the GMP are the contractor’s, unless the owner changes the scope.

Stands for
Guaranteed maximum price
Owner pays
Allowable cost plus fee, not to exceed the GMP
Over the cap
The contractor’s risk, absent an owner change
Under the cap
Savings kept or shared as the contract states
Often used with
Construction manager at risk
Different from
A lump sum, which is not an open-book cost

Definition

GMP (Guaranteed Maximum Price)

A lump sum is a fixed price. The contractor keeps the savings and eats the overruns, and the owner does not see the bills. A GMP is cost-plus with a ceiling. The contractor opens the books on allowable costs, adds a fee, and guarantees the total will not exceed the GMP. If allowable costs come in under the cap, the contract says who keeps the savings: the owner, the contractor, or a share. CM-at-risk projects often set the GMP during design, from an estimate, before the documents are finished. That estimate’s assumptions, allowances, and contingencies are the real content of the guarantee. A cap with an undefined scope is only a number.

In depth

The cap is only as good as the estimate under it

A GMP proposal itemizes trade costs, general conditions, insurance, fee, and contingencies. Allowances cover scope that is not designed yet. A contractor contingency covers risks the contractor is taking inside the guarantee. An owner contingency is the owner’s money for owner changes and should not be inside the contractor’s cap as if it were cost of the work. Mixing those three is how the GMP looks tight and then moves every month.

The drawings and outline specs the GMP is based on should be listed by date and revision. When design continues, the team needs a rule for what is development of the GMP documents and what is an owner change. Without that rule, every DD decision becomes a fight about whether it was "in the number."

Cost-plus rules decide what counts against the cap

The contract defines allowable cost: labor, subcontractors, materials, specified general conditions. It also defines what the fee is supposed to cover so those costs are not billed twice. Auditing a GMP is comparing invoices with that definition, not with a vibe about whether the job feels expensive.

Self-performed work needs a competitive check or a pre-agreed rate. A CM who self-performs a trade and also holds the GMP has two interests. The contract should say how that price is tested. Owners who skip the audit until the end discover unallowable cost after the money is spent.

Savings and changes move the number differently

Shared savings pay the contractor to beat the cap, which can be healthy or can reward an inflated GMP. Read the baseline. Buyout savings, the difference between the estimate and the subcontract award, are often where the money appears. The contract should say whether buyout savings are shared, returned, or used to fund contractor contingency.

Owner changes adjust the GMP. They should be logged as GMP amendments with the same care as change orders on a lump sum. Scope the contractor missed in its own estimate does not adjust the GMP. That distinction is the guarantee. Verbal scope growth that never hits an amendment destroys it.

When a GMP is the wrong simplification

Owners pick a GMP when they want a ceiling before the documents are done and are willing to administer an open book. They pick a lump sum when the documents are finished and they want a simple pay app. Converting a GMP into "basically a lump sum" by never auditing cost gives the contractor lump-sum upside and the owner GMP administration. Do one of them.

A GMP is not a promise that the project will cost that amount. Allowances get reconciled, owner contingencies get spent, and changes amend the cap. The promise is that allowable cost of the defined scope will not be billed above the cap. Report the current GMP, the cost to date, and the forecast as three numbers.

Examples

GMP (Guaranteed Maximum Price) on a real project

  • 01

    A CM at risk submits a GMP at 60% CDs, with allowances for unfinished site work and a separate owner contingency.

  • 02

    Buyout of the electrical subcontract comes in under the GMP line, and the contract shares the savings.

  • 03

    An owner-added room amends the GMP. A trade the CM under-estimated does not.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

GMP means guaranteed maximum price. It is the most the owner pays for the defined scope under a cost-plus contract. Allowable costs plus the contractor’s fee are billed up to that cap.

A lump sum is a fixed price. The owner does not pay actual cost, and the contractor keeps underruns. A GMP bills actual allowable cost plus a fee, with a ceiling. Savings under a GMP are handled however the contract says, often shared or returned.

The contract decides. Some return all savings to the owner, some share them with the contractor, and some let the contractor keep a portion as an incentive. The GMP amount itself is not the savings clause.

An owner-directed change should amend the GMP. Costs the contractor incurs because its own estimate was low generally do not. The log of GMP amendments is what the current cap actually is.
Accelerating the design and construction of the built world.

Unlock the value of your institutional knowledge—organized, connected, and grounded in your team's critical workflows with Nomic.

Start for free
What Is a GMP? Guaranteed Maximum Price Explained | Nomic